Loading ...
In one of the dumbest sequel Ideas I have heard of lately, IGN UK is reporting that Chris Fischer will be directing the sequel to 2001’s Donnie Darko. The film is called S. Darko and centers around Donnie Darko’s sister, Samantha (Daveigh Chase, reprising her role). 7 years after the events of the first film, Samantha and a friend are on a road trip to Las Vegas when they start having strange visions. Chris Fischer, whose films include such dreck as Nightstalker and Rampage: The Hillside Strangler, states that while there will be no Donnie in the film, there will be meteorites and rabbits. Yay.
Ed Westwick (Son of Rambow), Briana Evigan (Step Up 2) and Justin Chatwin (Dragon Ball) will be starring in the film and as of right now, there is no word on if any of the original cast will be making an appearance. Richard Kelly, the creator of the fist film, will have no involvement. Filming is to begin on May 18th. You will know the release date as the smell of a freshly laid turd grows stronger and stronger. The day it seems as if Dustin Diamond just gave you a Dirty Sanchez is the day you know the film is in your local theater.
Well, thank God I didn’t see that :p I don’t wanna see... - 
Why? It’s awesome. Horrorholic said that this is the clip they... - 
Ok Mikey….are we both talking about the... -
7 responses so far ↓
1
impqueen
May 9, 2008 at 5:33 pm -I kinda like Daveigh Chase. She was a cute Samantha and a cute Lilo and a cute little polygamist on Big Love, although that whole “married to Harry Dean Stanton” thing was/is creepy.
But um, no. You do NOT jack with the Darko. Just… no.
I suppose there will be no Jena Malone, either? And probably no “Mad World”?
I’ll end up seeing it, but I am not gonna like it.
2
Morbid
May 9, 2008 at 10:57 pm -Personally, as I may have alluded to in the actual article, I think this will be pure shit. Fortunately, I am also not the kind of guy who gets his panties in a bunch over shitty sequels or remakes.
I wouldn’t put it past Patrick Swayze or Drew Barrymore making another cameo, though. I mean, what the hell are they up to lately?
3
dop
May 10, 2008 at 12:40 am -Unfortunatley I am the kind whose panties do get in a bunch. Its fucking unconfortable to have em like that.
Swayze is fighting cancer, I wont pretend thats why he aint working, his last film people knew about was dirty dancing remake like five years ago but I doubt he will make time for this stinker.
Swayze’s character can be used on a good script tho, Barrymore’s I never understood much the point of that character in the movie or think it could do much good now. The parents are the ones they really need to pursue even if just for a cameo and those two aint bussy either…
4
Morbid
May 10, 2008 at 12:57 am -Meh, the remake thing just doesn’t bother me much. Sure I wish they would just make as original movie…but still, the remakessequels don’t ever take away from the original.
But it really doesn’t matter who would cameo in this one, as it’s just a dumbass idea to begin with, and there is no talent involved at the moment at all.
5
swivel
May 10, 2008 at 7:51 am -I’m actually excited about this.
I hate the first film, can’t stand the cultish emo fanboys that hug the nuts of the movie, and look forward to the “Matrix Effect” of the sequel bringing the original back down where it belongs.
6
dop
May 10, 2008 at 1:34 pm -I think part of the matrix efect was the “directors cut”, Im prety sure it was mentioned by Kelly himselve he dint had to cut anything short or change anything quite a few times before that came out then you get a version with every unescesary deleted scene trown in fucking up the pace.
7
TalkingJesus
May 10, 2008 at 5:20 pm -There are too many other movies that could and should be made to waste the money on this one. I mean some movies just scream sequel, but this is defiantly not one of them.
You must log in to post a comment.